Someone clearly felt he needed help. This is the difference.
Didn't you say it was a 14 year old girl who asked him his name? I didn't teach my kids to be afraid of 14 year old girls.
For someone who has instilled such a fear of strangers into your son, I'm absolutely FLOORED that you allowed him to ride his bike alone at 9. Clearly you feel like your son needed to know that EVERY SINGLE UNKNOWN PERSON was a threat to his safety, and he should never speak to them, but that it was also totally fine for him to be out there on his own at a park. Alrighty, then.
I think there is confusion here on what I've told you was REPORTED to CPS vs what ACTUALLY happened in reality. I'm sure I've added to that confusion and written incorrect things before. So let's clear this up now:
See, the thing is....there
IS NO 14 year old girl. That story was completely fabricated. You have to accept the fact that (drum roll)
THE SCHOOL IS LYING IN ORDER TO RETALIATE AGAINST US FOR REPORTING THE SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGIST FOR ABUSING MY SON
The truth is that my son rode his bike to the school and played on the jungle gym. Then the principal called him in to the office, then I came and picked him up.
That is according to my son.
The principal called me on the phone and told me to come pick up my son. On Friday at 4:30 when I was in front of the school with the principal and my son's teacher the principal told me he called the police and CPS to report that an autistic child was at his school unattended.
This is according to me who witnessed these events.
Friday night I emailed the Superintendent and said that this was a continuation of the harassment we've received from the district and I wanted it to stop. I outlined the fact the district lied on the prior written notice as an example of the harassment and I mentioned the child abuse my son suffered.
This is according to me who wrote the email.
Monday afternoon the Superintendent emailed me and said that the principal didn't call CPS. That there was no contact with CPS from the district officials. Instead the Superintendent said that it was a 14 year old girl who called CPS after she saw John fall out of a tree at a pond which is about .2 miles from the school. The email said I should be grateful that such a caring principal is looking out for my child.
My son said he was never at the pond. How could the district know a 14 year old girl called CPS on Friday by Monday afternoon? How would a 14 year old girl know my son's name if (as was stated in the email) my son never told her his name?
What I believe happened is after they saw my email mentioning harassment they talked with their attorney about if they could be liable and then they concocted this whole story about a 14 year old girl to cover themselves.
CPS told me they talked to the principal. The CPS report I was given talked about the concern due to an autistic child that has trouble in school who was unsupervised.
I can't prove that the principal made the report, perhaps a 14 year old girl called CPS and reported an autistic child that has trouble in school who was unsupervised. Perhaps the 14 year old girl just guessed he was autistic. And she guessed he had trouble in school. And she knew CPS's phone number. And she guessed my son's full name.
or perhaps it was retaliation.
You decide who called CPS:
14 year old girl
The principal
What do YOU think the truth is.